Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LarryS
True...but do you wear a tatoo or do you have a tatoo?  |
I "have" tatoos, and they are not "worn" - they are "displayed." (And not when officiating.)
Theoretically here (reaching - reach with me), could a vulgar tattoo not possibly be construed/judged to be an offense punishable by a flagrant technical foul? For instance, one that includes the
bad word? (-I've seen one in university intramurals.) - Although, I suppose it would go directly against the previously mentioned repeal of the pertinent NFHS rule.
Not that I'm wanting to do this, just stirring things.
