View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 27, 2006, 07:52am
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskers_ump
Maybe it was Mike....

RanD said:

Batter swings late at the next pitch and hits the catcher's mitt (with her bat) a fraction of a second after she catches the ball.

What am I missing?
Batter did not miss hitting the pitch, never had the opportunity. Just because the swing is late doesn't mean the batter loses his/her right to attempt to put the ball into play.

Obviously, as we all know (or should by now), that if you (the umpire) judge the act of the batter's hitting the catcher's glove to be intentional, that could be interference as the batter was not, in your judgment, attempting to strike the ball, but the catcher's glove. However, that would really need to be obvious and that may very much depend on the age level involved in the game.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote