Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rainmaker
And while I've gotten a little snippy with you, I certainly haven't attacked you like a piranha. And if you really think it's a "we" problem, then you can also stop attacking.
|
Piranhas attack in groups, it was not meant as a you only attack. I am the nicest gentleness man you will ever meet online, but cross me, and I will strike back, I will strike back!
Quote:
|
But it would still be nice to have some clue as to who you are and what your credibility is. It's just hard to understand where you're coming from, when we don't know where you're coming from.
|
I am here only to learn and debate the rules as I think I understand them. Debate and discussion is good for the old sole that thinks he knows it all, but learns that he really doesn't know much at all. Case in point, what you read and what you interpret you just read can be two different things. I think it was around the 3rd or 4th page, I learned that the calling official has precedence over the call. Rule 2-6 says no official has the authority to set aside or question another officials call. It does not exactly say, calling official has precedence over a call in his/her primary area. For me, this is key because now, I can take my understanding of this rule one step further than I could before, which is a benefit to my overall understanding. Just go to the table and report your call and attempt to move the game on. Don't stand there arguing with your partner over who's right or who's more right. Big key for me. It came at a price too, I mean I had to take a few insults, got sidetracked a little bit nursing some off-topic stuff, but, just like in the game, I kept my focus and I got thru it, and I got what I needed.
Be not too concern as to who I am but what I represent.
Peace