Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
Very good questions. The first one I'd probably have a double technical.
I can see the case for having a double intentional, but it goes against my current understanding that each of the types of fouls in 4-19 is a distinct type, and they don't combine to create new types.
|
Personal fouls and technical fouls are distinct types in 4-19, and they combine to create new types, don't they?
The NOTE from 4-19-1 reads
"Contact after the ball has become dead is ignored unless it is ruled intentional or flagrant or is committed by or on an airborne shooter".
If you have a double technicals for contact fouls by opponents on each other after the ball is dead on a made basket, your two choices then would be a double intentional technical foul or a double flagrant technical foul. Make sense?
Still a moot point anyway, as long as you rule them a double technical foul or a double intentional technical foul, and also do the same for flagrant acts. The penalties are the same, so it's basically just semantics.