Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Are you joking, or serious?
I think post-season refs should be the best of the refs who've been working similar games throughout the season. That seems pretty basic.
|
I'm (mostly) serious. This is actually in response to the other thread where this subject was brought up. I have noticed these types of discussions pop up in our association, especially around post-season time. There are the people that say only HS officials who are focused on the HS game should be rewarded with post-season assignments. We have had officials who only work HS boys during the regular season do girls post-season, while many officials that work girls' game during the season don't get any post-season assignments. Is that fair? What if the the officials that were picked are actually the better officials?
I really am curious as to what other people think. Eastshire brought up a point that I think many people share - why should those officials that only do the minimum number of games get to work post-season assignments, while the others that work more often and focus on the HS game get left on the sidelines. Is that fair? Should we care? What should we do about it? What is it like in your area? What about Naomi?