View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 04, 2006, 02:02pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
I have another question. How did you manage to have a single flagrant on a B player for instigating a fight without having a matching flagrant on A. Did A not retaliate? If not, how was it instigating a fight if the fight didn't happen? I'm just curious. I've only had two fights, and both times I had at least one player from each team.
He probably meant that the kid attempted to instigate a fight by an unsporting act, but that line continues to add "that causes an opponent to retaliate by fighting."

Strictly by the book it seems that the single disqualification that did take place should have been justified by 10-3-7c instead of the fighting rule.

Last edited by Nevadaref; Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 02:07pm.
Reply With Quote