Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tcannizzo
So, let's figure out what might make the most sense in applying this particular rule change. And how might be the best way to manage the 2007 game.
Suggestions:
1. It is not a rule change, just a clarification of wording for INT regarding non-batted balls.
2. INT by definition is an act which implies intent. Therefore, there is no such thing as non-intentional interference.
3. The call is INT. The no-call is incidental contact.
4. There are no changes in the way INT will be called in 2007.
Feel free to word-smith this list in any way.
|
Ohhh I know this one!! Pick me! Pick me!
Ok.. um.... I pick 1.... no wait!!! 4!!! wait wait wait.. ugh I get so nervous on tests... I pick 2 .. ugh crap.
Never mind, some one else can guess.