|
So, let's figure out what might make the most sense in applying this particular rule change. And how might be the best way to manage the 2007 game.
Suggestions:
1. It is not a rule change, just a clarification of wording for INT regarding non-batted balls.
2. INT by definition is an act which implies intent. Therefore, there is no such thing as non-intentional interference.
3. The call is INT. The no-call is incidental contact.
4. There are no changes in the way INT will be called in 2007.
Feel free to word-smith this list in any way.
__________________
Tony
|