Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimlet25id
The time out is the key in this play. We don't want the player to sacrifice his/her next game. So we need a sub legally. The only was is to tell the coach of the A team to call a time out and replace the player.
The play that I listed happened to one of my friends in a high school game. He assessed a T. On the basis that the opposing coach had a valid argument. I wanted to post this thinking this could come up somewhere else.
Time out allows subs to come in that weren't in the game before time ran of the clock.
|
I'd have to say that your friend was incorrect to assess a technical foul. Technical fouls are based upon a specific rule being broken, not upon whether or not a coach has a valid argument.
In checking the book for you (and your friend), the ONLY rules basis that I could possibly see for assessing a T here are:
10-1-5 . . . Allow the game to develop into an actionless contest, this includes the following and similar acts:
...
b. Delay the game by preventing the ball from being made promptly live or from being put in play.
and
10-3-6 . . . Delay the game by acts such as:
a. Preventing the ball from being made live promptly or from being put in play.
Both of those would be a stretch.
So I must ask, to whom did your friend charge the technical foul? Was it to the player, to the team, to the head coach?