View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 06, 2006, 09:29pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I got it right. It ain't the first time that the FED has pulled this one, cunning linguists that they are.

Stoopid question all the way around. There's absolutely no point to it imo.
I agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Sigh.....

It may or may not be an intentional act, not an intentional foul. The FED shoulda used a word like "deliberate" instead of "intentional". Mighta stopped you from getting all excited.
That's an excellent word, JR. I am going to suggest that as an editorial change for next season. [Change the word "intentional" to "deliberate" in 4-19-4.] That should take care of this kind of confusion.

BTW, can anyone provide an example of a flagrant foul that is not deliberate, done on purpose, or "intentional" ?
Reply With Quote