You believe wrong, but, hey, I'm just a poor slob who has the temerity to challenge a school teacher. (OK, increase your insult count by one. I thought I should tell you that since you seem incapable of recognizing the real insults. Now increase it by another one.)
Let's see, in my first reply to you, all I said was your recounting of what your darlings said was out of context. It was. Just because they are of the mentality that they took this "as if" I was insulting them does not mean I was. But, street thugs probably have a different definition of being insulted. Then, you then said, among other things,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FUBLUE
...it is just in your nature to be rude  . ... Of course, you would probably just blow them off because their opinion disagrees with yours.  ... It's sad that kids with an IQ of 60 can get the connection, and adults can't (or refuse to)! |
I generally (but not completely) ignored these digs, and instead focused on this comment...
Quote:
|
The "average" kid (if you can call a triple-homicide committing, drug-dealer average) even said, "man, they're getting what they THINK the government can and can't do mixed up with what the government LEGALLY can do."
|
Which told me you (and therefore, they) did not understand my point. I was expressing a political opinion on the proper interpretation of the consitution, not stating what I think our current legislatures can do or what the courts would find legal.
I did, indeed, respond in kind to your IQ of 60 dig. But, you started it.
You still have not addressed the issue of enumerated powers. Do you not understand the issue, or do you just not wish to address it?