|
What I find interesting is that Nemmers didn't even offer an explanation as to why the ruling stood. Every game I have seen this year, when a play was being reviewed, whether it was uphold or over-turned, an explanation was given as to why. Even on the fumble by the Pats later in the game that was also upheld, Nemmers gave an explanation as to why the ruling was upheld.
In the Wiggins instance though, all that was said was ruling on the field stands.
__________________
"Booze, broads, and bullsh!t. If you got all that, what else do you need?"."
- Harry Caray -
|