I think the point being discussed really revolves around whether the words "results in" in the correctable error rule mean:
- immediate and directly related to the rule being set aside.
- subsequent actions that follow setting aside a rule.
It is my belief that the (1) is intended. If it were to be (2), then an obvious but missed traveling in the backcourt would be subject to a correctable error if the team scores on that possession and the other team's coach questions it. The score wouldn't have happend if the travel had been called. We don't go back and get that. So, if we don't call it when it happens, we don't go back and get an OOB violation, even if it is just a fraction of a second before the score.
The rule set aside must be directly related to the counting or canceling the goal itself, not a prior infractions.