View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 30, 2006, 04:39pm
LilLeaguer LilLeaguer is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 209
I'm not a spokesman

Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
Now why would Little League, who is often criticized for going "overboard" regarding safety rules, be opposed to banning aluminum bats? Does Easton give $$$ to L.L.? Just wondering.
I don't speak for LL, but I can speculate:
  • Little League is a national organization. Having one set of rules in one state would be more difficult to adminster, especially in playoffs.
  • LL already addresses the safety issue with specific guidelines for LL bats, and may feel that the cost/safety tradeoff has already been optimized.
  • I'm pretty sure that ESPN provides more money to LL than any other corporation. I can't remember if equipment companies sponsor the games on ESPN, but any activity that diminishes the commercial value of the LL WS might be an issue. (This is why I'm not a whole-hearted supporter of the current version of the LL WS.)
  • I sure got the impression that the LL WS helmets were all supplied by one manufactorer, but I would guess that each team brought their own (usually individually owned) bats.
__________________
-LilLeaguer