View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 30, 2006, 10:16am
ChuckElias ChuckElias is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
If you cancel A3's foul, you also cancel any succeeding FT's for that foul. Whatinthehell would you put B3 on the line for if no foul ever occurred?
But you did put him on the line. He scored two FTs and the rule doesn't say to cancel those FTs.

Quote:
You're over-thinking this one.
Obviously. And I'm having fun doing it, too. Seeing the ruling in writing forced me to go back to the actual rule and I noticed the "discrepancy", for lack of a better word. I'm going to suggest to my rep on the rules committee to add the phrase "and all related activity" to the rule.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote