View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 01:59pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
While it is in the retired runner section, the exception does not say retired, which is one of the arguments friend Sam makes over on eteamz. Where is the rule, then, that a batter running when not actually a BR is interference?
Where is the "Retired Runner" section? What rule would that be?

The exception refers to a "BR" in this rule as a matter of convenience, but I think you know that.

To answer your question, there is no rule forbiding the batter from running which is why there is no call here.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote