Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Well, actually it doesn't. The rule book covers a retired batter running an an uncaught third strike when not entitled to advance to 1B. It does not cover a batter running on the wrong pitch.
However, I would rule in the same manner. Defense needs to know the circumstances surrounding the play.
|
While it is in the retired runner section, the exception does not say retired, which is one of the arguments friend Sam makes over on eteamz. Where is the rule, then, that a batter running when not actually a BR is interference?