View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 22, 2006, 07:01pm
wadeintothem wadeintothem is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by debeau
I agree
It seems to me the catcher new the call and tried to get an out on 2nd but threw wild .


Change slightly if I may and we have had this discussion before .
If catcher threw to 1st on a wild pitch to get an out when on strike 2 ball 2 would we have intereference on the batter as he/she confused hindered or interefered with the catcher making a play .
In this case confused , yes as throw was to 1st not 2nd where the out could have been made .
what?

if you are saying what I think you might be saying.. I will staight up disagree. I'm not calling INT for the def on a brain fart. Im not bailing them out.

And yes we've had this discussion a million times and always the Ifs for Int (who knows, might even get an IF for USC).

This play doesnt happen without an E2; therefore, the Def can pound sand, not look to me.

Also.. RF indicated throw to first to me..
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote