Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
If a team is charged with a time-out after a correctable-error conference, the "resuming play" procedure after the time-out is still not used because it doesn't meet the criteria of rule 7-4-4, as listed as being necessary in 7-5-1.
Just thought I'd throw that one in before you thought of it too.  |
Not to be argumentative, but to ask a legitimate question.
7-5-1 does not make a distinction between a
charged time-out v a
non charged time-out. It simply says, "After a time-out (as in 7-4-4)" which says "The ball becomes dead while a team is in control, provided no infraction or the end of a period is involved, as in 7-5-4."
So why does the resumption of play not apply to the original sitch of a
non charged time-out do to a correction of an error?