Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ronny mulkey
Chuck,
I quoted the wrong paragraph. Look at Jimgolf's next paragraph and you will understand my question (and it is a question) better.
It might be a question better left to another post so as not to confuse the intentional foul part of of the original post. But, I read that next paragraph of Jimgolf's to mean that if a "good blind screen" set by A1 results in A1 getting ran over, then it would be a foul on B1???
It really goes to the how much contact is allowed if the person setting the good blind screen is ran over.
|
The assumption was that the contact would be sufficient to call a foul. I guess I can be confusing too. But I'm not being paid to write this stuff.
For those who think the words in the parentheses are refering to examples of players that are not involved in the play, who
is involved in the play? Just the player inbounding the ball?