Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Based on this, if you call obstruction, you would be incorrect.
You keep debating this with me, as if I'm the only one saying this.[/b]
|
You are the only one who appears to have the necessary omniscience to tell someone they are "wrong" on how they would rule on a judgement decision, when none of us were there to see everything that happened, exactly how and exactly when. I haven't once said a judgement of no obstruction is wrong; I have simply said that given the information provided by the original poster and the statement contained in the OBR definition of obstruction, a judgment of obstruction can be supported.