Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DTQ_Blue
Thanks to Ozzy6900 for posting the Fed rule. I think the difference between the Fed rule and the OBR rule is significant in that the Fed rule does not contain the "while not..." exceptions where obstruction is not to be called.
I realize that many umpires wouldn't make the call I did, but I think that I made the right call considering the Fed rule was governing.
Put it this way, in a school ball situation where there is clearly a collision and the BR doesn't reach first base, I'd rather be protested for calling obstruction than for not calling it, because I'm protected by the Fed rule. The way I read the Fed rule, I could lose on a rule interpretation judgement if I don't call it.
If I'm playing "Official" rules, then I'm probably OK either way because I'm given room to make a judgement under the "while not..." clause.
Mike
|
Sounds to me like you could/should have had NO OBS ... but still killed the ball due to the contact when you feared he was hurt badly. You could then place him on first base - not due to the OBS... but due to the fact that you killed the play and he can't be placed anywhere else and can't be called out.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
|