Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
I think that you are making an assumption that is not true (more people will be watching the dribbler beating his man on offense than will be watching the player in the backcourt with no defensive pressure). I would include the covering official in this statement. For example, if there's no pressure, I'm not paying much attention to the dribbler -- I'm looking up court to see if there will be a trap, or if the offense is setting a screen that I'll need to monitor. I'm looking for the "next competitive matchup." When the dribbler is on offense, I'm looking intently at the dribbler and at the defender.
In addition, I will give the benefit of the doubt to the player in the backcourt (although I might say something to him quietly), but not to the player using the move to actually beat his man.
|
I'm talking about plays where there is
no doubt
at all that the dribbler ended his dribble, either by palming or touching the ball with both hands, and then dribbled again. If there was any doubt at all, personally I'm not gonna call anything in the first place- no matter where it occurred.
And, to make myself totally clear(hopefully), the assumption that I'm making is that the calling official
definitely sees an
obvious violation, but then chooses to ignore it.
An illegal second dribble does not depend on
how the first dribble ended; it depends on whether the first dribble actually did end or not.