Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tcannizzo
Would you call a strike if the catcher caught the ball before it crossed the plate?
|
Tony, perhaps you are not understanding what is being said here. I'll try one more time...
The POE you keep relying on is NOT a rule. It is a POE. It is there to help interpret the rule. The conditions of the rule that it is elaborating on must still be met, namely, that the batter's attempt to hit the pitch was obstructed.
In particular, the final sentence you keep quoting has two other aspects to it that will help in properly applying it. The first I have already pointed out: it says "
could be" not "shall be" or "is." "
Could be" if the other parts are there, namely, that the batter's attempt at the pitch was obstructed.
The other aspect to that sentence that will help is the opening parenthetical where it tells you when it applies: "(Fast Pitch and Slow Pitch
where stealing is allowed)" IOW, the POE is telling you that if, in your judgment, the catcher reached in to grab the pitch before the batter could hit it when something like a hit and run or squeeze play was on, then CO
could be ruled.
Merely having the mitt over the plate is not, in and of itself, CO. The "obstruction" part must still be there.