View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 10:26pm
FredFan7 FredFan7 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 252
I didn't see the game, but here's a guess at what happened.

He probably wanted to hold his whistle in case the play was reviewed and reversed. He may not have wanted to blow the whistle, kill the play and have the replay not be able to review the call.

He got the best of both worlds. Wait until the action is over, blow the whistle, make the ruling and if it really was a fumble, there was no whistle to kill the play and nullify a defensive recovery.
Reply With Quote