View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 08:41am
Jimgolf Jimgolf is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
So you don't have a rule / case play / interpretation that backs it up? That's what I thought.
Umm, I think I quoted the definition of an interrupted dribble, and showed that it's possible that this play doesn't meet this definition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
If in the opinion of the official the player continuously maintained player control, then this is a dribble and a violation.
That's all I was saying. There is more to this than meets the eye and the official has to use best judgment. I was not saying the case book play was incorrect, just that is was not as clearcut as almost everyone other than JTRICE was making it to be.
Reply With Quote