Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
So....basically you're saying that the case play is wrong and you're right too, same as JTrice?
|
No. I'm saying it's not as clear as you might think.
I know the image is of a player leaping out of bounds and recovering the ball after a heroic effort. Change the picture to a player tip-toeing in and out of bounds and tell me why it's the same ruling? Logically, if the player has never lost control of the ball then it's not an interrupted dribble.
If the player saves the ball, steps out of bounds with one foot, then steps back in, then the dribble hasn't been interrupted, since the ball has always been under the player's control. Is there another definition that I'm missing here?