Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RonRef
Are you saying that I should intentionally fail to correct an obvious error simply b/c I'm not "supposed" to be looking at it?
***Never, but why are you looking there?
|
Who knows? Maybe all 10 players are on the opposite side of the court. It happens. Maybe I'm having a brain cramp. Maybe I'm keeping an eye on a couple of troublemakers and they're on a coverage boundary. There are several reasons that I could be looking there; some good ones and some not good ones. The point of the previous discussion is merely that you saw it.
Quote:
Or are you saying that as the C, you never help out on a 2/3 point attempt near the top of the circle, even if it's in the T's primary?
***If I am a supervisor I would ask why do we have 2 pair of eyes on a 3 point attempt!
|
Honestly, I don't think a college supervisor would ask that.
Quote:
Or are you saying that you should be so focused on your one matchup in the C that you disregard the rest of the court?
***The rest of the court has two other officials working it, trust your partners.
|
As I already pointed out, there are legitimate reasons for expanding your coverage area.
Quote:
Or are you saying that it's not possible to have a good look at another area of the court while "looking through" that matchup?
***That "looking through" gives you a 100% look to see if your partner missed a foot on the line?
|
Possibly. Are you saying you can't be sure of anything you see beyond the matchup you're watching?
Quote:
Or are you simply saying that you think I'm an elitist prick? 
***Are you?
|
If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: I'm not elitist.