Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
Well, your call had "justice" on its side. And, it was probably easier to sell than calling the ball foul, and THEN ejecting the player and calling him out.
But, speaking ASA, it was a call not supported by the rules.
I gather by your response, you would like to have the "intent" judgment by the umpire added to the foul ball call?
|
On my call he was not ejected as I only called the interfierence and the out. The "EJECTION" word came on someone else post. To me calling the out is enough.
Yes maybe some wording should be added to cover such incident.