View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 02:55pm
cmathews cmathews is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by FootballRef05
Definatly not encroachment as MJT said. You had either IP or IS depending on what the kid did.
While I understand what you guys are saying, I disagree slightly. It is hard to tell from the post exactly how the kid came back on the field. Bear with me a second here. I do agree it could be called IS or IP but if you go with the possibility that the player didn't become a non-player, ie didn't complete the "substitution" you could then go ahead and call the encroachment...
Reply With Quote