View Single Post
  #85 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 14, 2006, 10:23pm
zebraman zebraman is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayStateRef
As for the Illinois ruling, I wonder if the interpreter would have a different view if he had all the facts -- as my interpreter did.
I would think so if he was pointed to the 2001 ruling. Our state has had a few interpreters and I never knew any of them who intentionally conflicted with a FED ruling. Most rule interpreters would probably appreciate getting all the info rather than having given out a conflicting interpretation. I know our current state rule interpreter has been given info before that has led him to change his interp and he has appreciated the help.

Z

Last edited by zebraman; Thu Sep 14, 2006 at 10:26pm.
Reply With Quote