View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 14, 2006, 05:22pm
mick mick is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Oh, my !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Yup.

We think it's wrong.
Well, the rule has read the same for as long as I remember, but some officials now want to re-think this thing.
I know they have read the book, and admittedly never called a violation for the original case, except seemingly one time.
I wonder how the rule changed using the same words.
mick
Reply With Quote