Quote:
Originally Posted by zebraman
That's what I figured. See, these rules interpreter's don't always remember every single ruling that came along. Just like we have to crack the books once in a while when we get a little hazy on a rule.
I'm quite certain that had you pointed him to that fed ruling, he would have said, "well, there you have it Rut. It's already been ruled on." Any rules interpreter that I have ever known would not intentionally contradict a ruling from the FED.
Z
|
No matter what I said, it would not have mattered to you. So if you feel he is wrong, do what I suggested little Chuckie do. It is not like his email address is not public.
Peace