Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old Time Ump
This will probably earn a 'Ridiculous' award from some of the young lads here,
|
And not just from the young lads, but from mature lads as well.
Quote:
|
but on the two occasions when this happened, 7.06 was invoked by the PU. In both cases the League upheld that decision. The ruling was that 'Obstructed' does not exclude an Umpire or even a fan coming onto the field..the 'Fairness factor', you know.
|
Both cases? That would mean that this has happend just twice in the entire history of baseball. Obviously, then, those times must stand out in your mind. Please let me know when these two instances occurred and who was involved and which league upheld a ruling contrary to the rules.
Oh, and 7.06? You mean obstruction? You mean:
OBSTRUCTION is the act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of any runner.
Quote:
|
If anyone here has actually called this play the way you call it in your statements here, could you please describe the runner's manager's reaction?
|
Do you give manager's a survey asking them future reactions about each potential call you may need to make and then decide whether or not to follow the rules based on their reactions?
You need to change your moniker to "old time troll."