Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ctblu40
The way I usually approach this is to ask them after the game if they "have anything" on me. Meaning, did you see me do something that you thought was wrong or just plain looked bad.
This usually opens up discussion. They bring up a point, and I either explain why what I did was correct or I learn that I'm doing something a bit "off."
|
I think this is an excellent way to approach the subject. Some guys, most I hope, would be receptive to constructive criticism. Others don't want to hear squat.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ctblu40
As far as going to the assignor, if he asks, I give my opinion. Otherwise, I move on. There was one instance that I called and requested to not work with a certain umpire. I had a banger at second on a steal attempt. I called the runner out and the manager came out on me and was irate. I felt 100% that I had it right. Skip managed to stay in the game. Between innings, I'm in short right field and I look in and see my partner sitting on the bench next to that manager drinking water.  In the parking lot after the game, Skip comes by and says, "Even ______ knows you blew that one." |
Usually I would only say something to the assignor if they asked; or, if I have a very good relationship with that assignor. In a case like you cited where your partner hung you out to dry I'd definately make mention of it.
I'd also add - if you have something negative to say, expecially to a less-experienced umpire, try to start with a positive. I think it makes the recipient feel more receptive if there's some praise to balance the discussion.