View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 01:03pm
scottk_61 scottk_61 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Robertson
My concern with applying the infield fly rule "after the fact" is that the baserunners may have tried to advance thinking they had to because the infield fly rule was not called while the ball was in the air. It seems a little unfair if any of them were tagged out because they thought they had to run instead of running at their own risk.
Why would this be unfair?
Would you have allowed a run to score if a runner had crossed the plate when the IF wasn't called?
Now where if the fairness.

Answer this, what is the purpose and intent of the rule?
If you can understand the purpose/intent of a rule then you can apply it correctly.
This applies to all rules and all codes.

Purpose and intent = a correct enforcement of any rule.
__________________
ISF
ASA/USA Elite
NIF
Reply With Quote