Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PWL
Did you not read? He had already been in for the three consecutive outs. He needed a plate appearance. Why else would the home team that was ahead try to let the visiting team a chance to tie the score in the top of the sixth inning. They didn't want to forfeit because the one player needed a time at bat to complete his mandatory playing time. If that was the case, the home team would have gladly sent him into the field for the top of the sixth to fill his required playing time. Try to keep up.
|
Oh, I see we're back to correcting my mistakes again. Yes, I misread. I missed the part where the kid already played defense. So what? The details are far less important than the point. You spend way too much time worrying about what I write. Smileys don't cover up sarcasm.
I also realized my mistake about 4 hours ago, but unlike you, I dont' go back and delete or alter my posts so as not to look bad, like some people (you) I know.