~Sigh~
"It is not about finding or looking for problems, it is about enforcing the rules of the game."
And therein Ron lies part of the problem.
Baseball, more than other sports, is heavily influenced by not only "common sense and fair play" but by what Evans calls "common usage and tradition."
We call a game with established rules (I consider them "guidelines") that have been influenced by not only decades of play situations but defined information from several sources that impact individual rules codes (i.e. before the recent OBR release there were 237 common erros in the OBR, slowly they are being corrected).
I am not going to sit here and call people names or get over emotional about any baseball rule, "guideline" or play.
I have given my honest and unadulterated opinion about this "mechanic" (not the rule, note we are talking about physical abilities) and the fact will always remain that I have not called this violation nor can I picture a time that I would.
For me (again, my opinion) is that umpiring is not done for "fun" -- it is a serious commitment and a constant effort to umpire a perfect game.
Sorry we can never agree on the play in question . . . but I do ask that you understand that some people review umpiring is a slightly different light than you.
I can understand your position -- can you understand, or respect mine?
Regards,
|