Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
I didn't know Rush was a participant in this discussion board.
There's a solution to that problem.
How an individual "sees" a play is how it "is" according to them. I don't follow this statement at all.
OTOH, if you mean "I call the plays based on what I see happen at the moment of safe / out and not what happened prior" then that's simple to understand. It's just as simple to understand that some do consider what happened prior when making a call.
I read 7.08(e) and 6.05(j) as completely contradictory -- the former says the runner is out if he fails to get there first (ties go to the defense); the latter says the (batter-)runner is out if the base is tagged first (ties go to the runner).
|
The statement that you don't follow was a quotation from a famous MLB umpire, whos name escapes me, who said this in response to the "call 'em as you see 'em" line, infering that many umpires "see" it one way, when in reality the opposite call would be the correct one.
So, according to your interpretation of 6.05(j), the tie goes to the runner, which contradicts one of
your 40 myths of baseball
# 15. Tie goes to the runner.
# 15. There is no such thing in the world of umpiring. The runner is either out or safe.
So, it sounds to me like you use 7.08(e) as the standard way of judging non-tag plays.
Oh, and what is the solution to the problem of continually needing to correct his misinterpretation of what I was trying to say? Don't just tell me there is a solution, and leave it like that. Go ahead, tell me the solution. What is it, quit trying to correct that person?