Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Oh, I can't illustrate absurdity by being absurd, but it's okay for Rush Limbaugh to do it, huh?
|
I didn't know Rush was a participant in this discussion board.
Quote:
|
I'm frankly getting a little tired of having to correct you.
|
There's a solution to that problem.
Quote:
|
I call the plays the way they "are," not how I "see them." What is so hard about this to comprehend?
|
How an individual "sees" a play is how it "is" according to them. I don't follow this statement at all.
OTOH, if you mean "I call the plays based on what I see happen at the moment of safe / out and not what happened prior" then that's simple to understand. It's just as simple to understand that some do consider what happened prior when making a call.
Quote:
|
Read it, been there, done that. I don't subscribe to the contradictory rule theory. I use 7.08(e), 7.01, and 6.05(j) for my "Runner is out" decisions:
|
I read 7.08(e) and 6.05(j) as completely contradictory -- the former says the runner is out if he fails to get there first (ties go to the defense); the latter says the (batter-)runner is out if the base is tagged first (ties go to the runner).