I can't seem to find this ruling. Just a sitch off your sitch, Ace.
What if everything happened like it did, but you felt the runner's actions impeded the fielder's chances of getting another out?
My thinking is that a runner could intentionally do something like this to prevent double plays, and score runs by interfering with fielders in non malicious ways.
You gave the offensive team a run by not calling INT. Was that player going to come home with the ball? Sounds like yes, since the infield was playing in.
So smart (although the runner wouldn't know why it was smart) baserunning?
|