View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 07, 2006, 12:58pm
mcrowder mcrowder is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Cecil, because local leagues insist on mangling the current, perfectly working, interference and obstruction rules, adding something like the one above.

Man, what would we do if ASA or FED rules had rules that said certain events "can result in an out". Talk about vague!

I think the answer to the main question presented in the OP is that on a play like this, IF you have interference (whether by ASA rule or local rule), play should cease and runners should be placed. So if the umpire is ruling an out on this play (whether by ASA rule, which should have covered this sitch, or by the vaguely reworded local rule), then the umpire should be ceasing play.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote