|
Rainmaker
I think that the "there has been no change of team possession" rule comes into play here. It seems to me that the error was made but the T results in an effective change of team possession from being a free ball on a rebound (or going to B on made FTs) to a situation in which A gets the ball automatically, regardless of FT result. The 2-10-6 rule comes into play if you have A getting an OOB play, somehow having a stoppage with A still in possession, then realizing that A should have had FTs. You give the FTs in this situation as normal. If A had gained possession then travelled, they would get FTs then B would get ball. I do not think that 2-10-6 is intended to address this specific situation.
|