View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 05, 2006, 09:18am
pdxblue pdxblue is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
Following up on Dave -- passed the infielder for purposes of this rule means the ball must be within a step and a reach of the fielder making the play. A diving fielder missing is not within a step and a reach, so the runner is expected to avoid contact with the fair batted ball.

The purpose of the rule is to protect a runner when there is no chance he can avoid the ball because he is screened by a nearby fielder.
I am sorry, but I disagree. You cannot back this interpretation in the rule book.

The rule ONLY says that if a batted ball touches a runner BEFORE IT PASSES A FIELDER, he is out. NOTHING ELSE! There is NOTHING about being "withing reach, or within a step".

This is scary discussion. eofficial simply got this wrong. I have had numerous times (okay, maybe 3 or 4 times....) in 20 plus years where the infielders were playing in, and a batted ball touches a runner leading off at second base. Never an arguement, and NEVER had a partner call it any different.

Intentionally touching a ball after it has passed a fielder, indeed I would have interference.
Reply With Quote