Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Camron said "The former rule allowed some amount of blood on the shirt. The new rule allows none. That's an incorrect and misleading statement imo. First off, it is not a new rule; it's the old rule clarified. And the old rule did not allow any blood anywhere if that blood was transferable.
|
But that's not what Camron said. NO ONE is saying that transferrable blood was allowable under the old rule. What Camron and I
are saying is that some blood was allowable, as long as it was not transferrable.
Quote:
|
you are still allowed some blood spots on a shirt as long as those spots are dried or chemically-treated so that they are not transferable.
|
What?!?! "3-3-6: Clarified that a player who has
any amount of blood on his/her uniform shall be directed to leave the game until the situation is corrected."
The change/clarification (as described above) is saying exactly the
opposite of what you just said, JR. You are allowed NO blood whatsoever, regardless of whether the official deems it transferrable or not.
I'm not sure why, but I really think that you've got this whole debate backwards, JR. The old rule allowed blood that was not transferrable; the new rule allows no blood at all.