Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Call it a clarification if you want but it is a change The former rule allowed some amount of blood to remain on the shirt. The new rule allows none.
|
I disagree completely with your statement above. There's no distinction in R4-3-6 as to where the blood is. Iirc, the purpose and intent of the original rule when it was implemented was that absolutely
NO amount of blood was legal if there was a possibility that the blood could be transferred to another person. Iow, players were
never allowed to have any blood on them if that blood could posssibly get on someone else.
It's also my understanding that this year's administrative, or editorial, change was made exactly because of officials misunderstanding the intent of the rule- as in your statement above.
Did you really allow players to remain in a game if they only had a small amount of blood on a cut, even if that small amount was sufficient to be transferred easily to another player?