[ASA/NYSSOBLUE]

Interesting you should bring this up! I have JUST picked up from my local library an interesting book called A GAME OF INCHES, which chronicles the evolution of that 'other game' step by step, telling the REAL stories behind the evolution of basebll rules and practices.....VERY interesting stuff!

Originally Posted by bkbjones

Ahhhhh...a chance to be a history teacher.

In various games including cricket, rounders, variations of o' cat and town ball, runners can (and do) run after a certain amount of bowls/throws/pitches. Won't tarry too long on that point.

What we today call "balls" and strikes" evolved in the 1800s. You can look up more of this online (I'm sure Google would provide you all you want to know), but "ball" is an abbreviation of an order by the umpire to deliver the ball to the batter's preference. A "strike" was the order by an umpire for the batter to hit a properly thrown/pitched ball, usually called "strike the ball" in earlier days.

For the majority of the 1800s, the catcher did not stand directly behind the batter. They would have been killed. Hence, it was advantageous for a batter with one strike left to swing at a ball they could not hit because they could usually reach first base - especially back when it took as many as nine "balls" to be awarded first base (or, even earlier, an infinite number of pitches deemed unhittable).

As equipment evolved, the rule allowing a batter to advance on an uncaught third strike remained, even though the catchers were playing much closer to the batter.

(Note - the catcher's position is still very much evolving. You can look at photos from the 30s and 40s and see catchers in nothing more than a crouch, not a squat.)

This is very much a Reader's Digest version of all this, but don't want to bore everyone completely.