View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 29, 2006, 10:09am
UmpJM UmpJM is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

ref49873,

Just two outs. A retired runner who continues to attempt to advance is explicitly NOT interfering by that fact alone. (8.3.3g) He could still do something ELSE which would be interference, but just continuing his advance is NOT interference.

The defense bears some responsibility for realizing that they have retired the runner.

JM
Reply With Quote