Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
The retaliation clause is there to cover someone provoking a fight with words or gestures....a noncontact action that causes a fight..
|
Camron, I think that you really, really should talk to a rules interpreter out there about your premise. The above pretty much sums up where you're coming from, and it's so far wrong, it's ridiculous. If it were true, why would 4-18-1 contain the words
"regardless of whether contact is made"?
I ain't gonna convince you- fer sure- so we're just gonna haveta disagree.
Btw, after viewing that video, what would you call?