View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 09, 2006, 07:27am
DonP DonP is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 12
FED Rules, spells out "must Vacate" ASA simply says "interferes with" The fact that the coach did not move because he was unaware, I now believe, was a mute point. Innocent yes, interfered with the fielders chance to make the play?.. Yes. If he had attempted to move, and still interfered because he moved too slowly or the same direction that the ball drifted and the fielder moved the same way, would you rule it then as well? (trying to vacate?)
Reply With Quote